The quality of a model's training data can make or break a model: flawed data yields unreliable AI. The biases, errors, or gaps that exist in the training data will be reflected in the model outputs. Model validation helps identify issues early on, before they result in downstream impacts to production.
Machine learning has enabled incredible advances across industries, from crop pest detection to automated vehicles. However, there’s one factor that can make-or-break even the most advanced AI models—the quality of the training data.
Yes, models analyze large datasets to detect patterns and use this learned logic to make predictions or decisions. But because of this, whatever biases, errors, or gaps that exist in the training data will also be reflected in the model outputs. Just as flawed code yields buggy software, flawed data yields unreliable AI.
If input data is incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate, the model insights will be similarly flawed, hence the saying “garbage in, garbage out.”
To avoid “garbage out” scenarios, we need to pay close attention to two key data quality metrics:
Maximizing data accuracy minimizes bias and factual errors that models might learn, while maximizing confidence signals the most meaningful connections exist in the training data between input features and target variables (and that those relationships aren’t just due to chance correlations within the dataset).
When models train on low-quality data, lots of things can go wrong. Consider a model designed to drive autonomous vehicles. If past driving data used for training is frequently inaccurate (perhaps with poor lane detection or obstacle recognition), those errors will transfer into the model's logic for navigating roads.
In the real world, that flawed training could prove catastrophic if the self-driving system makes hazardous decisions. In fact, incidents have already occurred from AIs misidentifying obstacles like semi-truck trailers—with tragic outcomes.
In manufacturing, robotics applications rely on computer vision and motion planning to manipulate objects. If images used to train perception algorithms contain distortions or if movement datasets capture sensor errors, the robot could fumble items or fail to recognize out-of-position parts leading to failures in final quality.
Just a 15% inaccuracy rate in training data in both cases can severely degrade model performance to potentially dangerous levels.
To guard against “garbage in, garbage out” scenarios, validation checks are critical to measure data accuracy, model accuracy, and the relationship between them. This end-to-end testing helps identify issues early on, before they result in downstream impacts in production.
With model validation, models are checked to ensure they’re accurately and thoroughly learning from the available training data by testing system performance against real-world samples. Common approaches include:
These methods assess both model accuracy—checking outputs against ground truth in test data—and model overfitting to indicate if AI is simply “memorizing” noisy patterns that do not generalize beyond the training environment.
It is important to note though, that model validation methods only work if the underlying data is correct ground truth data. If your ground truth is off and your test set fails then you need to have your current ground truth data reviewed and re-annotated. Another option is to curate areas of poor model performance and re-establish the ground truth.
A model validation partner can be a valuable resource to help streamline this process by not only reviewing model predictions but re-annotating ground truth data that can be used to fine-tune model performance.
The risks associated with data inaccuracy and model failure continue to grow as AI rapidly expands in usage across industries. Autonomous vehicles stand as a prime example, where flawed detections can literally become a matter of life and death if unvetted model issues emerge on the road.
Similarly for robotics, failing to validate model quality could hinder rapid prototyping efforts. If each iteration relies on untrustworthy data with flaws and inaccuracies, new versions will inherit and potentially amplify those errors. Applying model validation practices allows teams to detect and resolve these unseen issues early — preventing errors from spreading.
It’s why hundreds of enterprises turn to Sama to review their model predictions and make corrections where it’s needed the most. By thoroughly vetting input data accuracy as well as rigorously validating model performance with Sama Validate, AI teams can feel confident their systems reliably reflect reality before releasing to such high stakes environments.
Start your next project with the right data. Learn more about our Data Scoping package.
For the majority of model developers, a combination of the two — human and automation — is where you’ll see the best balance between quality and accuracy versus lower costs and efficiency. We’ll explore why humans still need to be in the loop today.
.gif)
The proprietary training solution builds on Sama’s commitment to excellence and an industry-leading 99% client acceptance rate by reducing project ramp times by up to 50% while increasing individual annotators’ tag accuracy by 16% and shape accuracy by 15% on average. For Sama’s enterprise clients, this results in higher-quality models going into production faster, saving both time and capital. For Sama employees, this new platform improves the training experience, offers greater understanding of data annotation and AI development principles, and builds their skills for successful long-term careers in the digital economy.
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools capable of generating human-like text, understanding complex queries, and performing a wide range of language-related tasks. Creating them from scratch however, can be costly and time consuming. Supervised fine-tuning has emerged as a way to take existing LLMs and hone them to a specific task or domain faster.
Sama provides ML Professionals and AI team Leads with an indispensable solution for Computer Vision data labeling.
